The Measure Applications Partnership (MAP) has submitted its
recommendations to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for
approximately 200 performance measures under consideration for use in 20
federal healthcare programs. This is the fourth, consecutive year that MAP has
submitted guidance to HHS on value based payment and purchasing programs affecting
the care of the nation’s 50 million Medicare beneficiaries and the providers
that care for them.
Over the past two months, MAP committees examined each
measure under HHS consideration for use in clinician, hospital, and post-acute
care/long-term care settings; came to consensus; and made recommendations about
each measure. Because some measures were considered for multiple programs, MAP
collectively made more than 600 decisions about how specific measures were
suited for specific programs.
During this process, MAP received 1,100 public comments—more than double the comments
received in 2013—from more than 110 unique commenters.
These comments and MAP’s discussions surfaced several
important themes, including:
- Simplifying measurement by moving toward a smaller
set of “high-value” measures that measure what matters and are meaningful and
valuable to patients and providers alike
- Increasing alignment or use of the same measures
across the federal government and between the public and private sectors—reducing
cases where the same issue or condition is unnecessarily measured in multiple
and different ways
- Continuously assessing what needs to be improved
in healthcare and working to ensure that measures exist to foster that
improvement.
“MAP is a terrific example of the private sector sitting
down at the table with government to work toward a true public good—better
quality and value in healthcare,” said Christine K. Cassel, MD, NQF president
and CEO.
MAP works in a transparent manner with a carefully balanced
composition of participants representing all areas of healthcare, including
consumers, purchasers, health plans, clinicians and providers, suppliers,
accreditation and certification entities, communities and states, and the
federal government, as well as subject matter experts for areas such as health
IT and healthcare disparities. In total,
more than 150 experts from 90 organizations who regularly use measures and
measurement information participated in MAP discussions.