“Home and
community-based services play a vital role in empowering Americans living with
disabilities, multiple chronic conditions, serious mental illness, or other
conditions, to live meaningful lives in their communities,” said Marcia Wilson,
NQF’s senior vice president of quality measurement. “This work is a much-needed
starting point for
developing a comprehensive, standardized system for measuring HBCS quality
across states, programs, populations, and payers to ensure that individuals receive
the highest quality of care possible.”
Reliance on
HCBS services is increasing as baby boomers choose to age at home or in other
community settings. In addition, many states are using Medicaid managed care
plans to provide HCBS. Medicaid—the nation’s largest funder of HCBS—announced earlier
this year new managed care regulations that require states to address HCBS
quality using standard measures in certain areas, such as quality of life. Although
little information is collected about HCBS quality, data are critical to drive effective
change, tie performance to outcomes, enable consumers to make informed
decisions, and compare the effectiveness of different HCBS models.
The report
summarizes the work of a multistakeholder Committee of experts convened by NQF
to develop a shared understanding and approach for measuring HCBS quality. The Committee
includes representatives from social services and other community support
services, as well as providers, payers, caregivers, advocates, and HCBS
consumers.
In addition
to recommending the development of a standardized core set of measures for
HCBS, the Committee suggests developing a menu of supplemental measures that
can be tailored to specific populations, settings, and programs and calls for
the development and implementation of a standardized approach to data
collection, analysis, and reporting. The Committee also recommends that
emerging technologies support quality measurement and suggests convening a
panel of HCBS experts to evaluate and approve HCBS measures.
The Committee
highlights 11 areas for HCBS measure development, such as person-centered
planning and coordination, caregiver support, and choice and control. These
areas encompass 40 measurement topics, with recommendations for short-term,
intermediate, and long-term action, along with measure concepts that are
promising for further development.
The Committee
notes challenges to measuring HCBS quality, including the lack of standardized
HCBS measures; the decentralized nature of the HCBS system; variability of
reporting requirements across federal, state, local, and privately funded
programs; and the administrative burden of collecting, reporting, and using
data for quality improvement.
In a forward
to the report, Committee members note “tremendous collective interest in moving
the state of HCBS forward,” evidenced by the large volume of public comment
regarding the work—among the most ever received for an NQF report. They express
their hope that the work is a starting point for a robust system of HCBS
measurement and that it is useful to states and advocates designing and
implementing HCBS programs.